Thursday, March 26, 2020

Remember By Christina Rossetti Essays - Rhyme, Sonnet,

Remember By Christina Rossetti Remember me when I am gone away, Gone far away into the silent land; When you can no more hold me by the hand, Nor I half turn to go yet turning stay. Remember me when no more day by day You tell me of our future that you plann'd: It will be late to counsel then or pray. Yet if you should forget me for a while And afterwards remember, do not grieve: For if the darkness and corruption leave A vestige of thoughts that I once had, Better by far you should forget and smile Than that you should remember and be sad. I chose to write my poetry criticism on the sonnet "Remember" by Christina Rossetti. It was written in 1849 when Rossetti was just 19 years old. She is considered to be one of the foremost women poets of the 19th century Victorian period. In this sonnet the themes of love, death, and reaction to death are introduced. Christina Rossetti was born in London in 1830. She was the product of a wealthy family and was raised a pious Calvinist. She wrote about many themes ranging from love to the seasons of the year. She used little visual detail in her poetry. She let her ideas speak for themselves. She is sometimes incorrectly associated with the women's suffrage movement but she was happy with her place in life and furthermore said that Christianity and womens' rights were at odds. She spent the last 15 years of her life in seclusion and died in 1894 a well-known poet. This sonnet, "Remember", is written to a lover and is about their love, her death, and how she wants him to react to her death. The themes are alluded to throughout the poem. Lines 1-3 deal with the element of death. Lines 5 and 6 hint that Rossetti and her lover were to be married, showing their love for each other, and lines 9-14 are Rossetti's instructions that her lover move on with his life and not dwell on her death because she would rather he "...forget and smile...than remember and be sad". Rossetti uses a metaphor in line 1 when she states, "Remember me when I am gone away", the metaphor being gone away instead of the word dead. She uses another metaphor in line 2 where she writes, "Gone far away into the silent land", using the term the silent land instead of eternal life. The third metaphor is found in line 11, "For if the darkness and corruption leave", using darkness and corruption as a metaphor for anger at her death. Rossetti does not use many symbols in her poetry but in this poem when she uses the term "silent land" for eternal life she may be referring to her Calvinist belief in predestination which John Calvin himself summarized by saying, "We call predestination God's eternal decree, by which he determined within himself what he willed to become of each man. For all are not created in equal condition; rather, eternal life is foreordained for some, eternal damnation for others" (Institutes 3. 21. 5). . She may have said"silent land" instead of heaven or hell because she did not know which eternal life she was going to reside in. The theme and simple language work together with the rhyme scheme, abbaabbacddece, work together to make the sonnet pleasant-sounding. I think the beauty of this sonnet is that it is both simple, in language and word choice, and complex, in idea, at the same time without being too overwhelming to the reader. I think the reader finds this sonnet easily applicable to his or her own lives, making it a universally likable reading. I think that Rossetti wrote this sonnet to teach all who read it that death is inevitable, but it should not consume the lives of those who are left living. She wrote this sonnet to her lover that he should not be upset if, after she died, he forgot about her because she would rather know that he is happy than that he is, in a sense, dead while alive. We should all apply this message to our lives because it is truly the best way to deal with the death of one we love.

Friday, March 6, 2020

Affirmative action debate essays

Affirmative action debate essays When they were first initiated, affirmative action policies were needed to address the discrimination faced by women and members of minority ethnic groups. These policies have enabled many people to secure better employment and educational opportunities. In their wake, however, affirmative action policies have also spawned criticisms of reverse discrimination, and given rise to charges that in the long run, these policies harm the people they were intended to help. This paper argues that while affirmative action policies were necessary in 1965, they are no longer appropriate in 2003. In fact, this paper presents arguments why affirmative action policies are ineffective in addressing the discrimination problems faced by African Americans, Latinos 1. Race is not a sharply-defined category. Many critics of affirmative action point to the problem of "racial boxing" that these policies inherently promote. Linda Chavez, for example, argues that race categories are arbitrary concepts, which are fluid and This problem is best illustrated in the arbitrary definitions of what constitutes being "Latino" or "Hispanic." An Argentinean person of Spanish ancestry, for example, would most likely be considered "Caucasian." However, if the same person speaks fluent Spanish instead of fluid English, he automatically becomes "Hispanic." Such arbitrary classifications are also at work among other racial groups. All Asians are usually lumped together because of the way they look. Such a catchall category, however glosses over important cultural differences and even makes light of deep-seated cleavages between groups like the Japanese and Koreans. Even Caucasian people of Eastern European descent are asserting their distinctness from other Caucasians. Just as it is impossible to classify who belongs to what ethnic group, it is also virt...